Bruce Brammall bought an investment property in the past decade. Jim Chalmers is about to pile on the pain
Bruce Brammall bought an investment property. Chalmers piles on pain

Bruce Brammall bought an investment property in the past decade. Now, Jim Chalmers is about to pile on the pain for property investors like him.

New tax changes on the horizon

The federal government is considering changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax discounts, which could significantly impact property investors. These changes, expected to be announced in the upcoming budget, aim to address housing affordability but will likely increase costs for investors.

Bruce Brammall, who purchased an investment property in the past decade, is concerned about the potential impact. "I bought my property with the expectation of certain tax benefits. If those are taken away, it will be much harder to make ends meet," he said.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

What Jim Chalmers is planning

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has hinted at reforms to negative gearing, which allows investors to deduct losses from their taxable income. Additionally, the capital gains tax discount, currently at 50% for assets held more than 12 months, may be reduced.

These measures are part of a broader effort to cool the housing market and make homes more affordable for first-time buyers. However, investors argue that such changes could lead to higher rents and reduced housing supply.

"The government needs to be careful not to punish investors who are providing much-needed rental properties," said property analyst Sarah Johnson. "Many investors are already struggling with rising interest rates and high property prices."

Impact on investors

For investors like Bruce, the changes could mean higher tax bills and lower returns. "I've been counting on the tax benefits to make my investment viable. Without them, I might have to sell," he said.

Industry experts warn that a mass sell-off of investment properties could destabilise the housing market. "If investors rush to sell, it could lead to a drop in property prices, which might be good for buyers in the short term but could create long-term problems," said economist Mark Davis.

Government's perspective

Jim Chalmers has defended the proposed changes, stating that they are necessary to create a fairer housing system. "We need to ensure that the tax system is not contributing to housing inequality. These reforms will help level the playing field for first-home buyers," he said.

The government is also considering other measures, such as increasing the supply of social housing and providing more support for renters.

As the budget approaches, investors are watching closely. The outcome will determine whether Bruce and others like him can continue to hold their investment properties or are forced to sell.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration