Two Australian teenagers have taken their fight against the federal government's impending social media ban to the nation's highest court. The 15-year-olds, backed by families who earn a living online, are mounting a legal challenge just weeks before the controversial restrictions are set to begin.
Families Fight for Their Digital Livelihood
Among those opposing the ban is the Babic family from New South Wales, whose life is a blend of family moments and digital content creation. For mum Courtney and her children, platforms are far more than entertainment; they are a classroom, a community hub, and a crucial source of income.
"We use social media to connect as a family and teach rather than restrict," Courtney explained. Their channel, which features everything from game nights to daily chores, generates revenue through live streaming and product endorsements.
The family has hit out at the blanket ban, arguing it fails to distinguish between passive scrolling and professional activity. They are calling for exemptions for young people who can demonstrate social media is their job.
"Maybe getting permits, making sure that these children have ABNs ... before just completely banning social media," Courtney suggested as a potential compromise.
Security Fears Over Massive Data Collection
The new law, scheduled to take effect on December 10, will require social media giants to collect extensive personal data to verify users' ages. This is expected to include sensitive documents like passports and driver's licences.
This mandate arrives amidst growing anxiety about corporate data security, following major breaches at companies like Optus, Medibank, and Qantas. Experts are sounding the alarm about entrusting this trove of information to tech platforms.
"I trust them with my information about as much as I trust my dog with an unguarded steak," cybersecurity expert Luke Irwin told 7NEWS, highlighting the profound distrust many feel.
A Nation Divided on Digital Safety
While the legal challenge proceeds, Australian parents remain split on the issue. Recent polls indicate between 65 to 75 per cent of parents support the ban. However, this also reveals a significant minority—roughly a quarter to a third—who oppose the government's approach.
The Babic family represents this opposition, emphasising managed access over outright prohibition. Courtney asserts she maintains full oversight of her children's accounts and fosters open communication about online activity.
"Despite the dangers lurking online, the parents insist their children are safe," the report notes, underscoring a key debate: whether safety is best achieved through education and supervision or through legislative restriction.
As the High Court challenge unfolds, it pits concerns over child protection against fears of overreach, privacy risks, and the stifling of digital entrepreneurship among Australia's youth.
