Pensioner Seeks Minister's Testimony in School Zone Sign Controversy
A Newcastle pensioner is taking a bold legal stand, demanding that the NSW Roads Minister appear in court to answer questions under oath regarding a disputed school zone sign. Stephen John Barrett, who is facing a $443 speeding fine, has pleaded not guilty and is preparing for a two-hour hearing where he hopes to challenge the validity of the signage that led to his ticket.
The Core of the Legal Dispute
Mr Barrett was booked for travelling at 57 kilometres per hour in a 40 km/h zone on Ingall Street in Mayfield East at 9.04am on August 5. He maintains that the signage at the location was incorrect at the time because there was no end school zone sign properly displayed to oncoming drivers. This absence, he argues, created confusion and potentially invalidates the fine issued to him.
In Newcastle Local Court on Friday, Mr Barrett represented himself and entered a plea of not guilty. The matter has been scheduled for a detailed hearing on May 25, where he plans to present his case comprehensively. Magistrate Peter Feather advised Mr Barrett to bring any evidence he wishes to submit on that date and noted that he could also request police to withdraw the charge in the interim if desired.
Political Involvement and Subpoena Plans
The pensioner has been actively corresponding with political figures about the issue, including the shadow ministry. He possesses a letter written by NSW Roads and Regional Transport Minister Jenny Aitchison regarding the school zone signage, which he intends to use as part of his defence. Mr Barrett has indicated to the court that he plans to subpoena several individuals, including Minister Aitchison, to testify at the hearing.
Speaking outside the court, Mr Barrett explained his motivation for wanting the minister to appear under oath. He seeks to question her about why a previously reported "backwards" sign was covered up and to address the contents of her letter to his local MP concerning his case. This move highlights his determination to hold authorities accountable for what he perceives as signage errors affecting public safety and legal fairness.
Background on the Signage Issue
The controversy stems from a school zone sign on Ingall Street that Mr Barrett described as appearing "backwards" when he spoke to the Newcastle Herald in September. At that time, there was no sign facing oncoming traffic to indicate the end of the school zone, leading to his claim of incorrect signage. In response to the issue, an end school zone sign was installed at the location in October, after Mr Barrett was booked.
This case raises broader questions about the clarity and accuracy of road signage, particularly in school zones where public safety is paramount. Mr Barrett's legal battle underscores the challenges individuals can face when contesting fines based on alleged administrative oversights, and it may set a precedent for how similar disputes are handled in the future.
