AFL legends Nick Riewoldt and Kane Cornes have strongly rejected the suggestion that Collingwood should pay Peter Daicos as a club ambassador, describing it as a potential salary cap loophole.
Salary Cap Concerns Raised
Cornes and Riewoldt argued that paying Peter Daicos, father of Magpies stars Nick and Josh, would be a way to circumvent the salary cap and retain the brothers at the club. They warned it would set a dangerous precedent for other clubs to exploit.
Background on Daicos Family
Speculation continues that Nick Daicos will be a prime target for Tasmania's new AFL team, the Devils, when they enter the competition in 2028. Despite being contracted to Collingwood until 2029, the midfielder could receive a massive offer due to concessions allowing extra salary cap space for marquee recruits.
On The Agenda Setters, Craig Hutchison questioned whether Collingwood had considered the impact of Peter Daicos on his son's decision. Caroline Wilson revealed that Collingwood has been exploring an ambassador role for Peter, including paid appearances and a retainer.
Wilson's Insights
Wilson noted that Peter Daicos was unhappy when his image appeared on a billboard without prior notice, leading to remuneration. Since then, club leaders have discussed sending Peter to Adelaide for events and paying him a six-figure sum as an ambassador.
Reactions from Cornes and Riewoldt
Cornes asked, "So, is this a way around the salary cap?" Riewoldt agreed, saying, "That's exactly what it is." Wilson argued it was legitimate, but Riewoldt insisted the AFL would not allow it, citing a previous loophole closed when GWS paid Tom Scully's father as a recruiter.
Cornes added that clubs like the Bulldogs and Brisbane could exploit similar arrangements with former players. Riewoldt concluded, "There's no way the AFL would allow it. It's a good idea, but the AFL won't do it."
