Donald Trump has a long history of directing vicious insults at female journalists who dare to question him or challenge his falsehoods. From calling a Bloomberg reporter "Quiet, Piggy" to labeling Kaitlan Collins "a corrupt reporter" with "hatred in her eyes," his attacks are relentless. Recently, he lashed out at Kristen Welker on NBC's Meet the Press, calling her "crooked or stupid" before storming off. Even in 2015, he infamously said Megyn Kelly had "blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever."
The Pattern of Abuse
While Trump also insults male journalists, his treatment of women appears especially venomous. He has referred to New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman as "maggot" on social media. Whether driven by misogyny, defensiveness, or distraction tactics, the behavior is unacceptable. Yet female journalists and their bosses often tolerate it in the name of professionalism, continuing to seek access and answers.
A Better Approach
There must be a more effective strategy. First, journalists should have "receipts" ready—audio or video of Trump's past statements—to counter his lies immediately. For instance, when Trump denied promising not to start wars during the 2024 campaign, Welker could have produced evidence of his earlier claims. Second, direct confrontation about lies is essential. Instead of normalizing his falsehoods, journalists should say, "Why do you keep lying about rigged elections when there's no evidence?" Third, journalists should be willing to end interviews if Trump continues lying or insulting, explaining to the public: "We're ending this interview rather than allow false statements."
Overcoming the Access Barrier
Media outlets fear losing access to Trump, which is prized in a competitive, ratings-driven environment. But tolerating abuse does not yield better journalism. Solidarity among journalists could also help. It's time for journalists and their bosses to decide that such treatment is unacceptable and take meaningful action.
