Paul Hasleby has stirred debate in AFL circles with a bold opinion piece published in The West Australian on Sunday, 26 April 2026. In the article, the former Fremantle Dockers player argues that when a team is struggling, even co-captains should not be immune from being dropped.
Hasleby's Core Argument
Hasleby contends that the tradition of protecting captains from selection pressure is outdated and detrimental to team performance. He writes that co-captaincy structures, increasingly popular in the AFL, can create a false sense of security and dilute accountability. When the going gets tough, he says, leaders must lead by example, but if they fail to perform, they should face the same consequences as any other player.
Challenging AFL Norms
The opinion piece challenges the long-held belief that captains are untouchable. Hasleby points to recent examples where teams have persisted with underperforming co-captains, resulting in poor on-field results and a lack of competitive edge. He argues that dropping a co-captain can send a powerful message to the entire squad that no one's position is guaranteed, fostering a culture of meritocracy and urgency.
Hasleby also reflects on his own playing career, noting that he witnessed instances where leadership groups were shielded from criticism, which bred complacency. He emphasises that true leadership is about earning respect through performance, not simply holding a title.
Reactions and Implications
The article has sparked discussion among fans and analysts. Some support Hasleby's view, arguing that modern AFL demands ruthless selection policies. Others caution that undermining co-captains could destabilise team morale and undermine the leadership structure. Hasleby acknowledges these concerns but maintains that short-term discomfort can lead to long-term gains.
He concludes by urging clubs to prioritise performance over hierarchy, especially during difficult periods. The opinion piece adds to the ongoing conversation about captaincy in Australian rules football and whether traditional models need to evolve.
