WA Government Unveils New Protest Laws Amid Mixed Reactions from Leaders
The Western Australian government has introduced new public order legislation aimed at empowering police to manage protests more effectively, with the Police Minister arguing it is designed to protect peaceful assemblies. However, the proposed laws could face significant opposition in the Upper House, as the Greens label them "dangerous" and "too broad," while the Opposition has not yet committed its support.
Details of the New Legislation
Premier Roger Cook announced the legislation on Sunday, which grants police the authority to refuse protest permits if events are likely to promote hate and to ban face coverings, except for religious or health and safety reasons. Cook described the reform as "sensible and effective" for fostering social cohesion, emphasizing that the right to protest remains fundamental and peaceful gatherings will continue to be supported.
Attorney General Tony Buti reinforced this stance, dismissing concerns that the bill threatens freedom of speech or peaceful assembly. He explained that the laws target behavior that escalates into violence, harassment, or intimidation, applying a "reasonable person test" to define unlawful protesting or face-coverings.
Context and Justifications
When pressed for examples from Perth protests, Cook cited the need for prevention in light of recent incidents, such as the Bondi terrorist attack in Sydney and the attempted bombing at an Invasion Day rally in Forrest Place on January 26. He noted that while he couldn't provide specific local examples, the potential for similar threats exists, particularly from individuals using face coverings to spread hatred and intimidation.
Buti echoed this sentiment, stating that events like Bondi and January 26 have changed the landscape, necessitating pre-emptive measures. He highlighted that wearing face coverings to intimidate or create fear would now constitute an offense under the new laws.
Support from Jewish Community Leaders
Dr. Michael Levitt, President of the Jewish Community Council of WA, expressed support for the legislation, viewing it as a positive step toward holding individuals accountable for inciting hatred and violence. He emphasized that while most people agree violence and hatred are unacceptable, laws that ensure responsibility for such actions are beneficial for community safety.
Criticism from Protest Organizers and Greens
In contrast, organizers of the Invasion Day rally, which was targeted in the alleged bombing attempt, called for the legislation to be postponed. They criticized the laws as "rushed and vague," arguing they were being pushed through Parliament without proper consultation or scrutiny, which they believe is essential for measures affecting fundamental democratic rights.
Greens WA MP Sophie McNeill also voiced concerns, stating that the legislation is being rushed and lacks clear communication about its focus. She expressed a desire to collaborate with the government to combat hatred but stressed the need for thorough discussion and transparency in the legislative process.
Opposition's Stance
Opposition Leader Basil Zempilas indicated that the Liberals and Nationals would await a proper briefing before deciding on their support. He affirmed a commitment to tough laws that balance the right to protest with community respect, suggesting that if the legislation achieves this balance, they would likely back it.
The debate over these new laws highlights ongoing tensions between security measures and civil liberties in WA, with stakeholders divided on the best approach to maintaining social order while protecting democratic freedoms.
