Bonnie Blue has outraged an entire nation after bedding over 100 men while apparently pregnant and inviting them to perform a graphic sex act that has sparked concern.
After it seemed fans had lost interest in her viral sex stunts for good, the controversial sexfluencer has managed to find herself at the centre of intense scrutiny once again, with some arguing she has crossed a line. So what exactly has the 27-year-old done to cause such widespread outrage in the UK, her home country.
The whole ordeal started when Blue, whose real name is Tia Billinger, first claimed she was pregnant after allegedly having unprotected sex with more than 400 men on February 7.
Fans initially did not believe the single porn star was expecting, noting she had falsely claimed she was with child a year earlier. Others pointed to snaps of her holding a fake silicone baby bump after heading to Spring Break celebrations in Cancun, Mexico, in April, which did nothing to end the speculation.
Despite the lack of interest from followers, Blue persevered with her pregnancy claims. She later shared photos of her carrying a fake silicone belly, but insisted to news.com.au that she is pregnant.
This morning, when contacted by news.com.au, Blue, who says her baby is due in November 2026, insisted: I am pregnant. She has also shared a series of photos and videos in recent weeks that are remarkably convincing. After running the images through in-house analysis tools, which check for signs of fake imagery, the result was that the likelihood of the images being AI generated is low.
This brings us to her latest stunt, her so-called baby shower, which sparked mass outrage after it took place over the weekend. Forget nappy towers and cupcakes, Blues unconventional celebration allegedly involved sleeping with 112 random men and letting them shower her with urine.
She even left LBC radio host Shekagh Fogarty feeling uncomfortable when she detailed her plans for the stunt live on air last week.
The reason her antics have left so many stunned is because, if her pregnancy claims are legitimate, it is not just Blue who could be impacted. Dr Vinay Rane, an obstetrician and gynaecologist at Melbourne Mothers, told news.com.au that while intimacy during pregnancy is perfectly safe for the vast majority of women, the greater medical concern is not the sexual activity itself, but the potential exposure to infection.
The uterus is one of natures most effective protective environments. It does a remarkable job shielding a developing baby from the outside world, he said. What it cannot do is prevent every infection acquired by the mother. Where there are multiple sexual partners, particularly if protection is not used, the risk of acquiring sexually transmitted infections increases. Some infections can have serious consequences for both mother and baby.
But the potential health risk to the unborn child is just one of the reasons so many people are angry about Blues baby shower. For others, it has called into question the issue of safeguarding the unborn child and the ethics of sexualising pregnancy.
Sharon Stoliar, President of the Maternity Consumer Network, Australias leading maternity consumer advocacy organisation, told news.com.au it was concerned about the way such stunts are promoted in pregnancy. It distracts from the reality that most women are striving to protect their babies, and they send a confusing signal to those who do not see the off-camera medical risks: markedly higher chances of untreated infection and, with that, real risks for the unborn baby and newborn, she said.
Most women go into pregnancy deeply committed to doing what is safest for their baby. They are constantly balancing their own needs with the responsibility of protecting the new life they are carrying. That is why highly sexualised public stunts in pregnancy, especially those involving large numbers of partners and bodily fluids, are so concerning from a health and public-messaging perspective.
She agreed with Dr Rane, stressing that while from a medical standpoint, ordinary consensual sex in an uncomplicated pregnancy is generally not linked to early labour or harm to the baby, the major concern in scenarios involving sex with many partners is not the sex itself, but the markedly increased risk of sexually transmitted infections and other infections.
Meanwhile, a leading British psychologist warned of the impact the explicit content could have on the unborn child later down the line. When children become connected, directly or indirectly, to highly public, adult content, we have to think beyond adult choice and consider the childs future wellbeing, privacy, dignity and digital footprint, said Dr Charlotte Ord in a viral video. Safeguarding is not about moral judgement or shaming consensual adults. It is about asking difficult but important questions. A child cannot consent to the narrative being built around them before they are born. And yet digital footprints can last a lifetime. Where do we draw the line when a child becomes part of the content?
Blue has taken suggestions that she has gone too far with her latest stunt in her stride, telling news.com.au: Im not concerned about the backlash. My baby is protected, she said, noting the uterus and amniotic fluid act as a guard between her and her sexual activities. Im not sure what piss does to others but it cant burn through skin, fat, muscle, sack and placenta. Luckily, my 112 baby shower attendees were not concerned either.
Her defiance has done little to quell her critics, with many arguing Blues stunt was disturbing and a kick in the teeth for those who are struggling with infertility. My partner and I are struggling to conceive, it is so hard to hear what she has done, said one. Cant imagine growing up and finding out this was my baby shower, shared another. As one raged: It is honestly disgusting.
