Federal Government's Outsourcing Bill Balloons Despite Election Promise to Cut Back
Government struggles to cut public service outsourcing costs

The Australian Federal Government is facing mounting pressure as its spending on external contractors and consultants continues to defy cost-cutting targets, despite explicit election promises to rebuild the public service.

New data reveals that departments are struggling to rein in outsourcing expenses, with some agencies actually increasing their reliance on pricey external talent rather than developing in-house capabilities. This trend persists even as the government publicly champions its commitment to strengthening the Australian Public Service.

Soaring Costs Defy Political Promises

When the current government came to power, it pledged to reduce the public service's dependency on expensive external contractors. However, internal figures tell a different story, showing that many departments remain heavily reliant on outsourcing for critical functions.

The situation has sparked concerns among public service advocates and budget watchers, who question whether the government can deliver on its promise to build a more self-sufficient public service while controlling costs.

Departmental Challenges in Cutting Contractor Reliance

Several factors are contributing to the ongoing reliance on external contractors. Many departments report difficulties in recruiting permanent staff with specialised skills, particularly in technical areas like digital transformation and cybersecurity.

Additionally, the flexibility of contractor arrangements allows departments to quickly scale up for specific projects without the long-term commitment of permanent hires. This short-term thinking, however, comes with significant financial consequences.

Budget Implications and Future Outlook

The continued high spending on contractors raises serious questions about budget management and long-term planning. While contractor costs remain elevated, the government faces the dual challenge of funding both external expertise and its promised expansion of permanent APS roles.

Public service unions have expressed frustration at the slow progress, arguing that investing in permanent staff would ultimately deliver better value for taxpayers and improve institutional knowledge within government departments.

As the next budget cycle approaches, all eyes will be on whether the government can translate its rhetoric into reality and finally curb the outsourcing culture that has become entrenched across the public service.