The ACT Greens are calling for the territory's ban on waste-to-energy incinerators to be made permanent, arguing that such projects pose significant risks to public health and the environment. Deputy leader Jo Clay emphasized that the community cannot afford delays in establishing a long-lasting prohibition on high-polluting facilities.
"Waste-to-energy produces harmful byproducts and pollutants like heavy metals, toxic air pollutants, bottom ash, furans and dioxins. It poses many risks for people, nature, our waterways, agriculture and our climate," Ms Clay said. She also noted that burning waste for energy generates greenhouse gas emissions and is not a sustainable or efficient energy source.
The ACT Waste-to-Energy Policy 2020-25 currently bans new thermal waste treatment facilities, except for safe disposal of medical and biological waste. The ban was extended in May 2025 without an official sunset clause, according to a government spokesman. The policy followed community opposition to a proposed incinerator in Fyshwick by Capital Recycling Solutions, which was abandoned in 2018.
Environment Minister Suzanne Orr stated in December that the policy would remain while the government considers future changes, with no set timeframe for consultation. A government spokesman confirmed that key actions, including construction of a new recycling facility, will support the transition to a circular economy.
Ms Clay pointed to the territory's legislated human right to a healthy environment, saying Canberrans deserve to know if the ban will continue. Toxics Free Australia chair Jane Bremmer supported the Greens' stance, stating that waste incineration emits more carbon pollution than coal and gas per unit of energy and threatens the transition to clean renewable energy.
Meanwhile, Veolia has proposed a $600 million waste-to-energy incinerator near Tarago, New South Wales, about 50 kilometres north-east of Canberra. The company argues that the technology is safe when operated to international best practice emissions controls, but the ACT government has previously confirmed its opposition to such facilities.
